Designing e-Government
Edited by
J.E.J. Prins, 2d ed. (The Netherlands: Kluwer law international, 2007)
Reviewed by John D. Gregory*
(2007) 6 Canadian Journal of Law and Technology No.
2
Electronic government has
developed more slowly and less uniformly than its more mature relative,
electronic commerce. Though the two
e-phenomena share certain problems (satisfying writing requirements,
authentication, determination of time and place), e-government has a number of
distinctive characteristics and different issues that challenge its proponents
in practice and in law.
Professor Corien Prins of Tilburg
University in the Netherlands has a long-standing interest in these challenges.
She helped organize a colloquium in 2000 on international perspectives on
the legal and practical developments in this field, the results of which were
published as Designing e-Government.[1]
Several years (and a number of other publications) later, a similar event[2]
offered her an opportunity to assemble material for a second edition of the
book. Parts of the new work present
an overview of e-government from various aspects; the other parts review the
implementation of e-government in several countries. Some are updates of chapters of the earlier collection; some
are new to this volume.
A common theme throughout the work
is the attempt to define e-government. The
contributors find a common core – electronic transactions with the public and
the use of electronic communications within government itself, sometimes
referred to as electronic administration – but expand beyond that, if at all,
in different ways. Electronic
“engagement” is sometimes proposed, either overlapping with or separate from
electronic democracy and electronic consultation. The impact of electronic technology (generally called
information and communication technologies, ICT, throughout the book) on
government regulation is described for some countries. Sometimes civil society organizations are included, sometimes they are
not.
Within this range of definitions,
the contributors cover many particular uses of information technology:
e-publication, e-procurement, e-filing with government and with courts,
electronic petitions, and e-voting. National,
regional and local initiatives are described. Some are pilot projects, some are mature, though all seem in evolution.
No one pretends to have a final picture of what e-government can offer.
The texts in this collection offer
a mix of practical and legal analysis. Some
start off describing the legal barriers to e-government and how the barriers are
being removed, then continue to the actual effects of the changes. Others begin with the goals of e-government, and later describe the legal
adaptations necessary to achieve the goals. Others yet go back and forth between administrative initiatives and the
laws that support or impede them, and the politics of their interaction. Thus in some countries studied, the challenges of e-government can be
seen mainly as legal, and in others mainly as social, cultural or
administrative.
The legal issues that most
resemble those presented by electronic commerce are the most readily handled.
Some countries have covered them in a single statute for both public and private
legal relations. Others draw more
of a distinction between public administration and commercial relations. In many, administrative law must be developed differently.
As the chapter on Germany notes, the legal requirements for e-government
are more demanding than those for e-commerce. The use of ICTs in business can be justified by efficiency gains,
“whereas efficiency is merely on[e] of several relevant aspects within
e-government.”[3]
Governments need to be more mindful of fairness, formality (to prove
fairness and to maintain the public archival record), security, and even
constitutionality in designing the legal framework for electronic relations
between state and citizen.
Some of the laws that touch
e-commerce have more profound implications for e-government. The chapter on Italy says that the legislation for digital signature is
“a fundamental pillar for the implementation of e-government”, but “it is
too rigid and demanding for private business.”[4]
Information security is important to public and private sectors, but
government has wider responsibilities in this area, up to and including national
security, so the rules for dealing with government are often stricter than
within business transactions.
The law of privacy is a frequent
example in these texts as well. Though
most countries require private actors, or at least businesses, to protect
personal information, the rules for the state are more rigorous. The amount of information collected can turn e-communication into
e-surveillance. The desirability
and the means of producing a national identity database is relevant to several
authors.
At a higher level, the practical
impacts of e-government can require a reorganization of internal government
functions in order to better serve the citizen and be responsive to public
demands. The spread of information
and the ease of feedback push the state away from hierarchical relationships
towards networking, i.e. a more horizontal organization. This evolution may require changes to administrative law concepts of
authority and accountability. If
the process for making decisions changes, then the rules may also have to change
about who makes them and what kind of action formalizes their binding nature.
The opening chapters of the book
give an overview of e-government practices, laying out different perspectives
that should or can be taken into account in understanding their current state
and their potential. Lenk and
Traunmüller[5]
review four key perspectives: that of the addressee – focusing on the
citizen/government interface; that of the process – standardizing
e-communications; that of co-operation – making the non-standard relationships
work; and that of knowledge – managing the essential asset of the information
age. How the use of ICTs to enrich
these aspects of government will change the structure of government is, for the
authors, an open question. They
acknowledge the possibility that simpler access methods may merely hide the
continuing complexity of the governmental structures behind the portals. They
mention in conclusion the legal values that existing structures serve, notably
the rule of law. Changed structures
will have to satisfy these values to be sustainable.
The following chapter[6]
reviews the role of voluntary organizations in “web-enabled ‘public
spaces’”, showing how a selection of English advocacy groups has evolved
their relations to the public and to the government by electronic means. To date, the authors find good use of the web for information,
co-ordination and fund-raising, but less clear operation for legitimizing the
organizations or providing public accountability.
The final overview piece[7]
touches on portable and interactive technologies in e-government. The impact of mobile communications on citizen access and equality is
reviewed, and the possibilities of control canvassed relatively optimistically.
Nevertheless the chapter is admittedly speculative; there is much more
talk of potential than of actual use. It
raises the issues that are likely to arise in the future as the technology
spreads into e-government.
The book then turns to country
studies: two for the United States and one each for Canada, the United Kingdom,
Germany, Italy, Denmark and the Netherlands. These chapters are rich in detailed description and analysis, and
together show the variety of approaches taken to the application of ICT to
government.
The first American analysis[8]
focuses on three particular areas of interest: making court records available to
the public online, and the impact such access has on privacy interests;
fulfilling the detailed requirements imposed on government agencies to solicit
public comment and publish what they hear in “rule-making”; and the risks of
electronic surveillance and threats to privacy. The author concludes that “there is nothing especially new
about the relevant legal issues.”[9]
The important process is figuring out how the known rules apply to the
new situations.
The second U.S. chapter[10]
surveys the legislation supporting federal and state programs in the framework
of the policy directives first stated in 1993. The federal focus has evolved in recent years to the internal processes
of government institutions, in part because of the different economics of
electronic technologies since 2000. A
quick look at state legislation is followed by case studies of state
initiatives. All in all, the states
are more “citizen centric” than the federal government nowadays.
The Canadian analysis[11]
is the longest and arguably the most comprehensive study in the book. Within the continuing theme of the impact of a networked world on public
law, Professor Trudel reviews questions of government services, government
organization and the values of governance in the new relations between
administration and citizens. “In
government composed of networks, law’s role is to regulate rights and duties
related to episodes in the information life cycle.”[12]
He looks at e-government policies, principally those of the federal and
Quebec governments, then turns to the legislative reforms adopted across the
country that touch both commercial and public communications. The chapter addresses the key challenges of protecting personal
information while maintaining the strong interest in identification systems.
It continues with examinations of electronic filing, authentication,
document retention, and access to documents held by public bodies.
The author sums up with a
fascinating canvass of the high-level challenges of analysis in this field:
“epistemological” – new ways of thinking about problems, including
privacy, trust and integration; and “methodological” – how to audit
e-activities to manage the risks. He
concludes that “the basic paradigms of administrative law in general, and of
personal data protection in particular, have to be reworked.”[13]
The United Kingdom[14]
launched e-government initiatives with a view to better governance and more open
governance. Over the course of a
decade, the emphasis has fallen largely on delivery of services, however, and
not on e-democracy. Many of the
most innovate and successful initiatives have been local rather than national.
“[R]ather than using formal legislation, policy documents with targets
are published, and posts are created which have responsibility for these
targets.”[15]
Secondary legislation, i.e. regulations and other statutory instruments,
are widely used for legal issues. It
is noted that privacy is one of the key current legal issues presented by
e-governance. Thus the Data
Protection Act of 1998 is one of the key legislative drivers, along with
access to information legislation. The
author also notes that direct electronic communication between the Prime
Minister and the population can undermine the role of Parliament in debating
political issues, which affects traditional legal roles and could weaken
democratic structures.
The German experience[16]
has been almost exclusively with electronic public administration, not
electronic governance. The legal
regime for e-administration is said to be in good shape, but public acceptance
or uptake is much less. The chapter
discusses several federal initiatives, including online portals for government
departments. Discussion of legal
issues focuses in particular on digital signatures, much used in submitting
official documents to government. The
degree of security needed for such signatures in most dealings of citizen to
state is open to debate.
Italy has had challenges in
harmonizing central and local legal regimes.[17]
A number of national regulatory agencies have provided coordination. The author says that the only way to make the decentralized structure
work was by using ICTs. Coordination
was applied to interconnection standards and then to digital signatures, in
support of the integrity and authentication of electronic documents. The operation of the Italian public key infrastructure is
described in some detail, as are the electronic identity card and methods of
promoting secure communications. A
final lengthy section details local administrative initiatives, their impact on
different sectors of activity, and their suitability to be adopted in other
localities. Much attention is paid
to the transferability of such initiatives, to economize resources and to
optimize standardization.
The Danish chapter[18]
says that e-information is the most developed aspect of e-government, with
e-transactions much less common and e-participation experimental only. A number of policy studies have been done, there as elsewhere.
One of the legal challenges is to decide whether any citizens should be
required to deal with government by electronic means. The government for its part has undertaken to deal electronically with
those who wish to do so. Questions
of privacy, identity and security remain crucial, along with electronic
authentication. Problems with electronic voting are dealt with in more detail
here than elsewhere in the book. New
Danish legislation is now being analysed with a view to removing barriers to
digital administration in its implementation.
The final country chapter deals
with the Netherlands.[19]
Here too, privacy has been an important element of the legal regime. In addition, a national authentication service has been established.
Efficiency of e-government communications is on the agenda, for example
to ensure that key data need be provided to the state only once. Efficiency is seen in the Netherlands as elsewhere as sometimes the enemy
of privacy. The chapter describes
the principal statutes that support e-government, many specific to government
and to electronic communications, though some (privacy again, and access to
information) are media-neutral and apply offline as well as online. Archives encounter particular problems with electronic
records. The author recaps the key
legal areas to indicate the main questions for future work in each. She remains concerned with the digital divide, the implications of
personalizing government services to individuals, and the shift of initiative
from citizen to government that seems to result from e-government, at least in
the delivery of services. On the latter point, she does not seem to share the
general optimism of most of the authors that e-government will lead to citizen
engagement and (presumably) empowerment.
Professor Prins sums up the
collection of essays with a comparative analysis of e-government across borders.[20]
It is clear from the country studies that different economic or political
histories will affect the implementation of e-government. E-Government is a tool to realize policy choices, and policies differ
from place to place, particularly as one moves away from mere provision of
information. The degree to which e-government can be promoted by legislation
also varies. A question in many
countries is whether the same law can apply online as offline. The frequent answer is “often but not always”.
She concludes that “legislative reform alone is not a
guarantee for the successful development of e-government.”[21]
Education is needed, and an appropriate evolution of the technology
environment in society itself. That
evolution may – though has not in many of the countries studied – promote
“a new state paradigm” that will “change the very relationship between law
and its object of regulatory focus: the public sector.”[22]
This is a very rich, ambitious and
stimulating book. Clearly
e-government has many aspects that are being developed at different paces in
different places, and not necessarily in the same direction. A range of legal tools are being used, some to remove
barriers, some to coordinate efforts of different actors, and some to solve
particular problems. The lessons
from one jurisdiction for the next are not always clear, but comparisons are
fascinating in any event. The most
fundamental challenges remain suggestions only: those that networked
environments pose to notions of accountability and rule of law that have been
conceived of for a hierarchical government. Professor Prins and her colleagues – and their readers – have not
finished their work…
*
General Counsel, Ministry of the Attorney General (Ontario). The opinions
stated in this review are not necessarily those of the Ministry.
[1]
J.E.J Prins, ed., Designing
e-Government : On the Crossroads
of Technological Innovation and Institutional Change (The Netherlands:
Kluwer Law International, 2001).
[3]
T. Fetzer, “e-Government in Germany” in J.E.J. Prins, ed., Designing E-Government, 2d ed. (The Netherlands: Kluwer Law
International, 2007) 185 at 185.
[4]
S. Salza, “The Italian e-government experience: setting up the ICT
infrastructure and regulating central and local action” in Designing E-Government (supra
note 3), 203 at 212.
[5]
K. Lenk and R. Traunmüller, “Broadening the Concept of Electronic
Government” in Designing
E-Government (supra note 3),
9.
[6]
E. Burt and J. Taylor, “Voluntary Organisations in the Democratic Polity:
Examining Web-enabled ‘Public Spaces’” in Designing
E-Government (supra note 3),
23.
[7]
C. Theunissen, “Contextual issues surrounding portable and interactive
technologies within the contemporary and future environment of e-government
and informatisation” in Designing
E-Government (supra note 3),
47.
[8]
J.C. Reitz, “e-Government in the United States” in Designing E-Government (supra
note 3), 69.
[10]
K. Zweers, “Electronic Government in the US: a CITIZEN-centric
Approach?” in Designing E-Government
(supra note 3), 87.
[11]
P. Trudel, “The Development of Canadian Law with respect to
e-Government” in Designing
E-Government (supra note 3),
113.
[14]
B. Schafer, “e-Governance in the United Kingdom” in Designing E-Government (supra
note 3), 165.
[18]
P. Blume and H.C. Spies, “e-Government in Denmark” in Designing E-Government (supra
note 3), 229.
[19]
S. van der Hof, “The status of e-government in the Netherlands” in Designing
E-Government (supra note 3),
245.
[20]
C. Prins, “National Perspectives on E-Government and Required Regulatory
Change” in Designing E-Government
(supra note 3), 263.
|
|